There is a much evidence that the NKJV
translators and publishers did not believe God preserved His words.
It is clear the NKJV made Thomas Nelson
Publishers a lot of money. Did a King James-type Bible renew their hearts to
God? Note the following facts:
- They are also the publishers of the
American Standard Version, the American revision of Westcott and Hort's
perverted English Revised Version.
- They are also the publishers of the
Revised Standard Version, the revision of the American Standard.
- To this day they continue to sell at
least six Bible perversions. The NKJV was just one moneymaker
that helped Nelson "reclaim its place" as a major publisher.
- The NKJV repeats the lie that "There
is only one basic New Testament used by Protestants, Roman Catholics,
and Orthodox, by conservatives and liberals." In fact, there are two:
the perverted Alexandrian line that was continued by the Roman Catholic
religion and the preserved, apostolic, Antiochian line that progresses
from the Christians at Antioch of Syria (Acts 11:26) to our precious
King James Bible.
Quoted from:
What is
Wrong With the New King James? by David W. Daniels
https://www.chick.com/battle-cry/article?id=Whats-Wrong-With-the-New-King-James
Thomas Nelson Publishers fruits reveal they are
not concerned about the purity of the scriptures.
They also published Revolve for teen
girls and Refuel for teen
boys which are filled with worldly, anti-Christian commentary.
return to:
Barbara Aho Bids Goodspeed to King
James 1611
Main index in this
series: The New King James Version and
the One World Church |