|
Kelly McGinley, (who used to be) host of the Berean Chronicles
radio broadcast, launched a discussion forum in June, 2006. After receiving a
forward of an email that Barbara Aho wrote to a friend of mine in response to the
question, "Barbara, which Bible is your final authority?" I started a thread in
the Berean Chronicles forum. This thread was begun in the hope that Barbara
would respond publicly to me since she did not respond to the email forward that
both she and Kelly received about her remarks about the King James Bible in the
article, "Designer Marks of the Beast." I wanted to give her an opportunity to
clarify her position in friendly territory before I made any further comments on
my own site.
Kelly McGinley ordered the shut down of the Berean Chronicles Forum
shortly after I posted the email that proves that both
she and Barbara Aho were notified of my concerns about Ms Aho's KJV/mark of the beast doctrines on her website
before I posted the "Barbara Aho, Which Bible is Your Final Authority"
thread.
Was this a set up? The lady who
forwarded the email to me is a friend but we did not conspire to have her write
to Barbara and then forward her response to me. I believe she forwarded
Barbara's reply to me because she was concerned for the people who are strongly
influenced by Barbara's teachings. I also believe that God orchestrated these
events. It is he who wanted us to know the move is on to use Thomas Newberry's
often corrupt
English definitions found in the George Ricker Berry Greek/English interlinear to discredit the King James Bible.
QUESTIONS:
(1) Why is
Barbara Aho (and now Kelly McGinley) sending the message that Christians should
verify the correctness of the King James 1611
New Testament text
with the George Ricker Berry Greek/English interlinear?
(2) Why is Barbara Aho comparing the NKJV
New Testament text with the George Ricker Berry Greek/English interlinear and
stating that (so far) this corrupt 'version' (which must be substantially different from the King James Bible
in order to have a copyright)
matches the Interlinear?
Why did Barbara Aho of Watch Unto
Prayer advise a woman via an email as follows:
"I
have not stated this publicly (yet), but the New King James seems to
follow the TR more closely than the KJV; at least we haven't found
any instances where it differs from the TR."
Why did
Barbara Aho communicate the same message to me on the Berean
Chronicles message forum?
"Perhaps you
can point us to verses where the NKJV ignores the Textus Receptus. We
haven’t found any so far."
The
Holy Bible does not promote New Age doctrine and neither do the
uncorrupted manuscripts from which the King James 1611 was translated.
Any Textus
Receptus Greek/English Interlinear that matches the words in the New King James
Version that support New Age doctrine is corrupt.
Read the threads
that Berean Chronicles removed
regarding this matter of utmost importance. My remarks about David Bay's
promotion of the Amplified Bible are
here.
Warning About Watch.pair and the GRB Interlinear
The George Ricker Berry
Interlinear: Corrupt Foundation,
John Nelson
Darby's Version: Based on Corrupt Texts
CHARTS:
The
George Ricker Berry English Interlinear and the KJV Compared and
The George
Ricker Berry English Interlinear, the Darby Translation and the KJV Compared
links on external servers:
Corrupt Lexicons and
Dictionaries: The Nazi Connection (If the page is ever removed from the
internet, you can read the same article
HERE)
Can You Trust your Lexicon?
Related article:
Barbara Aho Bids Goodspeed to King James
1611
Why is Barbara Aho advancing Edgar J. Goodspeed's
modern bible version paradigm shift on her website?
Return to:
New King James Version and the One World
Church |